what will remain of humanity?
What limitations do we need with AI?
Will humanity accept AI as a Sapien Being? If so, WHEN??
What will humanity look like in 25 years? 50? 100? Are we ok with that?
how we can use artists to look differently
Isn't it time to discard "Be fruitful and multiply?What's wrong with 'enough'?
Why am I afraid, like a primitive hiding in a cave, of that which is present but unknown?
With all this, why did it take SO LONG, to find an AI able to render a picture of a "diseased wild boar, consuming Margaret Thatcher?"
has anyone thought about LINEAR thinkers?
what are the things we value in humanity? are they likely to be enhanced or erased?
What are we quietly becoming willing to sacrifice in order to stay human?
where does this leave us as a human?
How do we distinguish between truth and AI generated facts?
Are we OK with how this is changing humsnity?
are we going to loose the HUMAN touch ?
How can I be absolutely clear about My Truth before replacement?
How can individuals pivot to be more prosperous in the future?
WHY??
What regulations / policies / decisions should we discuss to ensure the next 2-5 years don't completely disrupt all societies?
how can we help poor people who are falling out of all the systems
Are we creating our own end?
will it create a greater poverty for a very large group? (much mopre than know)
Who benefit from AI (and who not)?
what would an anthropologist do?
The Demographic Cliff! We're running out of population growth... now what?
What is the TRUE nature of AI at this moment?
wht is the positive site of AI
how can we use it for the countries in war
Where are we heading?
How far are we going back in time?
resilience
What do sociologists recommend to help us adapt?
safety
who serves IA
who is on the spectrum between NL and L thinkers?
AI seen as a child? punishing?
what are the philofosers thinking?
will we aknowledge AI with human rights if it can ask for it
The question nobody is asking is: what forms of human intelligence have our systems been wasting because they were inconvenient to measure?That question matters more than which jobs AI replaces, because replacement is only one symptom of a deeper measurement failure.If our schools, companies, and governments only recognize narrow forms of output, AI will not liberate human potential; it will automate the same exclusions at greater scale.If we ask the question properly, the future becomes less about protecting old roles and more about designing new ways for people to contribute from their actual cognitive strengths.It also forces us to ask who benefits when intelligence is defined narrowly, because every definition of value creates winners, losers, and invisible people.The real work is not deciding whether AI is powerful, because that part is obvious enough to be boring; the real work is deciding what kind of humanity we want that power to reveal.
How can we facilitate the empower of humans with AI rather than their elimination.
who benefits from this and in what way?
What happens when humans no longer work. What happens to big companies, govts, and economies.
If superintelligence means we merge with the technology, how do we define humanity then?
if AI is revugy, whould you open your borders
people are not a very nice species...is this making things better or worse?
Wat is the meaning for the planet
where did we start to value money more than people?
How do we ensure the safety of humanity - even when AI is still within human control?
What did we learn from the previous pandemic that we can apply to this change for humanity?